It looks like everyone is facing away from the store as if theyre waiting in line for whatever store is next door 😆

As mentioned this is not easy to print. You might consider cutting the model into two pieces. From the shown orientation, I would do a planar cut just below the top surface, trying to capture those “screws” (I don’t know what they’re called, they tighten the strings) in the top cut and then flip the bottom section over so the spherical dome is printed like an upside down bowl. This should only require supports for the large piece at the top of the neck. In Bambu Studio (possibly OrcaSlicer) you can also add connector pieces for proper alignment when doing cuts too, but they may he unnecessary when gluing it back together.

Also for future reference, when you see models that only show 3D renderings and no actual finished print, you know you’re in for some trouble. I try to avoid these at all costs.

If hes been living there more than 30 days, he has tenants right and legally you must allow him in the room as well an ensuring you’re promptly feeding him breakfast at 5am, 6am, and 7am.

Source: attorney specializing in cat law

Crank down on that back left corner a little more and rerun this test to see if you can get it under a 0.2mm range for the height difference. Since you’ve moved the printer off the table and on to the floor it may have altered things so you’ll want to redo it anyway (and any other time you physically move the printer).

I think its a bit excessive. That shows there’s almost a two and a half layer (at a standard 0.2mm layer) difference between the high and low spots. On my old printer with klipper installed, I would shoot for less than 0.2mm.

What if the first soldier has all three cigarettes in his mouth and lights them all at the same time? Haha checkmate, Athiests!

Roadside breath tests arent admissible in court because they aren’t certified testing devices. Only the one at the station with a record of maintenance is admissible.

Field sobriety tests are complete pseudoscience and only exist to gain evidence against you not to prove you’re sober. You should never consent to them and if an officer asks you to take one you’re already going to jail regardless.

I’d bet you could soak it in some CLR to get rid of the deposits.

I think the doctor can give you a medicated cream for that and you should probably drink more water.

Not completely unnecessary. I have several 95% used tricolor filaments that aren’t wound with the colors in the same orientation so I can’t just feed a replacement in. I’ve tried splicing but it’s been insanely difficult to get them to line up properly while the plastic is still heated.

Fair enough but has anyone actually audited how secure Jellyfin is when exposed directly to the open internet? Not even the actual developers of the software recommend that, yet the majority of the replies here are being overly smug and cocky thinking it’s perfectly safe to do so.

Obvious troll account.

Note that opening a port gives full access to that port to the next higher Network. Opening a port directly to the Internet is therefore insecure and not recommended.

It says so right there.

There are multiple ways of exposing Jellyfin to the outside - the most common ones are:

forwarding its Ports directly to the internet (not recommended!)

forwarding through a Reverse Proxy

using a VPN connection to enter the Network

use a VPS to Reverse Proxy to your home network

And there.

This smug mentality that security is unnecessary when exposing ports to the open internet reminds me of people who think its fine to drive drunk because “I’ve done it dozens of times before and nothing happened!” It also reminds me of the mentality of tech company VPs right before they have a massive data breach. It’s quite absurd to read.

This seems like a naive viewpoint as you’re exposing your whole network and everything connected to it to the open internet. Just because the port connects to Jellyfin doesnt mean there isn’t some exploit or vulnerability that can allow for greater access. This is media software written by volunteers and offered for free, so I wouldn’t expect Fort Knox security from it just because its FOSS. In fact, they specifically put the onus on the user to do this themselves if they so chose.

Previously you could pay a one time fee to watch remotely on Android and iOS without having the Plex Pass and now it sounds like they’re rolling this into the Plex Pass and asking users to pay again.

Not necessarily the same drive but the same pool. I have a ZFS pool with 6 drives and can use hardlinks just fine.

“So check this out, I was breakin’ in my new trainers by squatting in the middle of the sidewalk in my tracksuit as one does, and all of the sudden this little bloke starts choking on a Werther’s Original, so i jumped into action…”

You can’t spell c-h-i-v-a-l-r-y without c-h-a-v

Oh I wonder if this is the same guy who’d tag a GPL license onto the end of his comments as if this were Facebook and they’re telling Mark Zuckerberg that he doesn’t have permission to use their comments.