Nah I’m good, was able to find it on my own. The thing it misses is that what people call “AI” isn’t deterministic, since it has no sense of actual meaning (it is, after all, just an evolution of your phone keyboard’s word prediction, just with an enormous amount of both data and compute). So it could pass an exam one time, then fail it right after even if the conditions don’t change. It hallucinates. A lot. So your idea of an “AI knowledge base” is flawed by design.

Nah it’s not controversial, just stupid.

You seem to be hallucinating even more than “AI”, which I wasn’t sure was possible, but here we are.

Unless what you are doing is heavily I/O dependant (mostly heavy database workloads), that’s not really true anymore, especially with a modern CPU and say, LUKS encryption. Phoronix has a recent review of FDE using LUKS, and apart from synthetic I/O tests, the difference isn’t really observable.

Try cryptsetup benchmark on your pc and look at the results for aes-xts for example.

Hard disagree. From my experience you can perfectly collaborate from a distance, it’s mostly a matter of organizing around it. Of course it can vary on the type of work, so I would think that the better answer is “it depends”.

Yet in your comment you declare that it sucks and mostly does not work as a general rule? I just want to say that your own experience, while relevant, does not necessarily apply to everyone. Maybe it sucks for you, maybe it sucks for most people you work with or talked with about that subject. But one experience, or even a group of experiences, do not make for a universal truth.