

Spending the day working in a field, in a factory, etc you don’t do a lot of socializing.
Marketer. Photographer. Husband & dad. Lego, Minecraft, & Preds hockey fan. Movie buff, but pls #NoSpoilers!
Also @pwnicholson@mastodon.online Also @pwnicholson@pixelfed.social Also @pwnicholson.bsky.social Used to be @pwnicholson on IG, FB, TW, etc


Spending the day working in a field, in a factory, etc you don’t do a lot of socializing.


Some of the DVD/Blu-ray versions of “GalaxyQuest” have the entire movie dubbed into the weird screeching alien language as a quirky bonus feature.


I don’t, really. But my field is also kinda niche (it’s not like some popular field like genetics or infectious diseases. There aren’t many journalists covering us at all, yet. I work in marketing for an industrial exosuit company (think practical, assistive, biomechanical wearables). Most of the journalists that are covering us at this point are used to covering news about forklifts or warehouse automation, so they aren’t used to reading peer reviewed scientific publications at all. Their exposure to papers on biomechanics and injury risk factors is more rare, and they might as well be Latin (well, sometimes they do have a lot of Latin).
But it’s also something of a joke. When I was back taking journalism classes for my communications and marketing degree, the professors would joke about how journalists covering either legal summaries or scientific summaries would say that 1 + 2 = 5 all the time, leaving out important details that were critical to the conclusions because they weren’t interesting. I think the scientists put up with it because as long as the conclusion is correct, they’re just happy to have anyone paying attention.


As someone who works in communications in a very science-heavy field: in fairness, journalists are also typically terrible at summarizing scientific papers.


How Simon broke River out is pretty significantly different, that’s the biggest one. A few other small things.
And I refuse to consider “Serenity” canon for other obvious reasons.


Between the Joss factor and the fact that the heroes are obviously based on “lost cause” confederates, who today are all racists hicks, it’s hard to watch now. But it’s soooo well made.


How can it be canon to both the show and the movie? The movie wasn’t in the same canon as the show.


Do we only pay servers if they’re waiting tables?
Yes, actually. In the USA anyway. They’re paid very low wages and that’s a very common form of wage theft that goes unchecked and unreported: restaurants required servers to do pre-shift work at their normal sub-minimum-wage pay with no hope of making tips during that time. It’s illegal but happens all the time


Lots of great answers already, but one interesting thing that seems to be like it would keep more mammals from evolving to fly:
extra weight of the young during gestation.
Egg-laying birds get to breed but don’t carry around that extra weight for nearly as long or as heavy. That’s got to be a huge evolutionary advantage, right?


I think the more direct inspiration was Gus March-Phillips. The recent movie “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” is a fictionalized telling of the work that the team Ian Fleming was on, based of some of the recently declassified missions.
Either way, if you’re interested in the topic it’s a really fun movie.


Eh, you’re probably right, but I also know a lot of people from various Houston burbs and they all lean right/MAGA, so I’ve got some observational bias going on too


Houston is as well considering it’s massive but full of mostly sprawled suburbs and tons of oil people or friends/relatives of oil people.
It is in the context of a guy singing. The next line is something like “if it was a dog that had howled thus, he’d have shot him”


“Is it not strange that sheep’s guts should hail souls from mens’ bodies?” – Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing
(Guitar/lute strings used to be made from sheep gut, for anyone confused)


Correlation is not causation. They never addressed speed or distance, which are clearly the biggest factors in the chances of fatality and the chances of having a wreck at all (respectively)


The main issue is distance (and speed), not time. Your far less likely to be in a fatal car crash (or crash out any kind) in slow-moving city traffic jams vs driving from your rural house to your job in the next small town doing 85 mph on a 2-lane highway, which is the scenario a lot of folks in rural areas have every day


The guys who came along years later and were (more) openly about drugs and sex (instead of semi-covertly about it)


The Rolling Stones were always the spoiled rich kids pretending to be tough. The Beatles were poor kids pretending to be posh. There are whole books written about that dynamic.


I thought free software was when you were the product and non-free software actually supported developers.
Or do you mean non-OSS?
Ray Charles beat them all (kinda, sometimes)
MadTV did a good skit about this years ago
https://youtu.be/FhEpv14L-b0