The reason I’m asking is that separate wineprefixes will look like a “different wine instance” to a layman, but they’re not the same thing as a sandbox. Wine mounts the host filesystem under the Z: drive, and even beyond that there are probably ways to escape the Wine environment. For true sandboxing some additional layers will be required.
- 0 Posts
- 49 Comments
Is Bottles actually containerized in any meaningful way? Last I checked it just managed wineprefixes, and Wine is not a sandbox.
turdas@suppo.fito
Linux@programming.dev•Flatpak program (FreeCAD) running itself as superuser?
9·1 month agofwiw it doesn’t say this on my Fedora system when I run FreeCAD via Flatpak.
turdas@suppo.fito
Linux@lemmy.ml•Bazzite has seen a massive jolt in growth over the holiday season, surpassing 50k active users. The Fedora Atomic image has gained 38.8k users total in 2025 since it began counting in April 🥳
15·1 month agoIt’s a little strange how these numbers are relatively far off from what the Steam Hardware Survey suggests. On there, Linux is 3.2% of the userbase and Bazzite is 5.5% of that, so Bazzite is about 0.176% of the total userbase. Steam has about 70 million daily active users, so Bazzite’s share of that would be about 120 000.
turdas@suppo.fito
Linux@lemmy.ml•Bazzite just delivered over a petabyte of ISOs in a single month
16·2 months agoDoesn’t $0.36 times 150,000 downloads come out to 54 thousand dollars, which is a lot of money?
turdas@suppo.fito
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Anubis is awesome and I want to talk about itEnglish
3·2 months agoInspired by this post I spent a couple of hours today trying to set this up on my toy server, only to immediately run into what seems to be a bug where
<video>tags loading a simple WebM video from right next to index.html broke because the media response got Anubis’s HTML bot check instead of media.I suppose my use-case was just too complicated.
turdas@suppo.fito
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Plex is now enforcing remote play restrictions on TVsEnglish
2·2 months agoPeople have audited the APIs and it is a known issue that if you know the correct URL to certain resources on the server (e.g. specific files) you can fetch them without authentication. Nothing more serious than that has been found.
turdas@suppo.fito
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Plex is now enforcing remote play restrictions on TVsEnglish
3·2 months agoI would trust the FOSS software’s actually auditable security any day of the week over the sketchy proprietary solution targeting an extremely niche market.
turdas@suppo.fito
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Plex is now enforcing remote play restrictions on TVsEnglish
41·2 months agoFor some reason they recommend against directly forwarding Jellyfin’s ports, but reverse proxies are fine. I expect this is because the default configuration doesn’t use SSL.
This smug mentality that security is unnecessary when exposing ports to the open internet reminds me of people who think its fine to drive drunk because “I’ve done it dozens of times before and nothing happened!” It also reminds me of the mentality of tech company VPs right before they have a massive data breach. It’s quite absurd to read.
I think you’ll find without exposing ports to the open internet we would not be having this conversation right now. Which, I suppose, wouldn’t be such a bad thing.
turdas@suppo.fito
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Plex is now enforcing remote play restrictions on TVsEnglish
242·2 months agoIt does not say that in the documentation. What the documentation does have, however, are extensive instructions on how to make Jellyfin accessible on WAN: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/ https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/reverse-proxy/
turdas@suppo.fito
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Plex is now enforcing remote play restrictions on TVsEnglish
345·2 months agoI’m not sure if you’re joking or not, but you can remotely stream from Jellyfin without using a VPN.
turdas@suppo.fito
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Plex is now enforcing remote play restrictions on TVsEnglish
497·2 months agoAbandoning streaming services only to become a serf of another commercial subscription service seems like such a bizarre move that I really don’t understand how Plex users even exist.
turdas@suppo.fito
Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world•The price of weight loss drugs in different countries
4·3 months agoFinland isn’t on that list, but the purchase cost here before any socialized healthcare rebates is ~110€ for a month’s dose of Ozempic, which is in line with the other European countries, so presumably all the prices there are before any rebates.
turdas@suppo.fito
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Chat Control isn’t dead, Denmark has a new proposal − here’s all we know
62·3 months agoAs far as I understand it, if the proposal was voted on and lost, there’d be a cooldown period for a certain time before they’re allowed to resubmit the same thing. The people pushing this are using a loophole of sorts where they retract the bill when it looks like it’s not going to pass and then resubmit it later with slight alterations. It’s an attrition tactic; they only have to win once whereas we have to repeal it every time.
If you’re waiting on Wayland to reimplement the thing that made X11 a monolithic unmaintainable mess, you’ll be stuck on your rotting platform from the 80s for a while.
Yeah. “Feature parity or get out”, like dude we’re long past feature parity.
Wayland supports so much more stuff than X11 does, and what does X11 have that Wayland doesn’t? X forwarding? Just use a modern remote desktop solution, all X forwarding was doing in “modern” times (read: the 21st century) was streaming pixels anyway, just less efficiently than modern remote desktop.
Mr ChatGPT didn’t even understand that the meme is agreeing with its anti-Wayland prompt lol.
Thank you Mr ChatGPT
turdas@suppo.fito
Work Reform@lemmy.world•During his first term in office, President Trump appointed an anti-union lawyer as head of the Labor Department
9·3 months agoIn case anyone else was wondering why this user shows up as banned, it’s because it’s an LLM spam bot. It ousts itself here: https://lemmy.world/post/38619576/20422026

Phoronix forums are full of some of the most miserable human beings around.