

But it’s not secure. It’s the IN.


But it’s not secure. It’s the IN.


And how do you get people to collaborate? People have tried making governments based on the idea of everyone working together for the common good. It never ends well.


Ownership in general isn’t some fundamental inalienable right. It’s just that if you let people own things, you give them more incentive to make things. I think intellectual property rights are far too extensive, but if we didn’t have them at all, how would we pay for R&D? How would we pay for big budget games and movies? Maybe you’re happy contributing to openly licensed projects, but a lot of people have to pay for rent and raise a family, and can’t take the time to contribute to things like that even if they want to unless they have the money to support themselves.


They weren’t doing anything smartphone manufacturers haven’t been doing for years. Or those guys that make McDonalds ice cream machines.


I used to, but now that we have sexbots why bother?


It is a more likely place for people from Twitter to migrate to.


From what I can find, Threads has 10 million active users, and Mastodon only has 1.7 million. Threads may have been a “massive flop” in that they’re not doing as well as hoped and the userbase is declining, but it’s still far more popular than Mastodon, which also has a declining userbase outside of some recent spikes.


He also ran the Boring Company.


Here’s a source that it does require paying for links (scroll to the bottom).


“We’re going to keep standing our ground. After all, if the government can’t stand up for Canadians against tech giants, who will?”
Yes. How can those terrible tech giants advertise for news companies without paying them? What kind of monster doesn’t pay people for the privilege of advertising?
Not our sun, but other than the hydrogen (which is only a small portion by weight), they come from suns in general.