Ardour !

Kodi https://kodi.tv/

Glad you find something of interest in my comment.

Well, it’s true. I’m open to suggestions, feel free to share.

So go vote, be in unions, call your representative about these matters.

This should be how the message ends.

Seafile

Faster, cleaner ans lighter. It’s faster because it’s lighter. It’s lighter because it’s made to be efficient rather than selling stuffs to you. It’s cleaner because it can delete its temp files by itself, something windows still doesn’t want to do.

Audacity can have multiples inputs. If it can receive sound from one usbc-c it should receive two…

I would suggest to work with a proper sound card and standard mics rather working with USB mic you won’t be able to use for anything else.

Yes that can be difficult some time.

But it’s really mandatory to anyone wanting to use GNU/Linus.

The main challenge is resisting the urge to install Linux on your own. Because you will need help at some point, so start now by asking for help.

And then, when you don’t find the solution by yourself don’t waste time and ask for help.

In time you will get it enough to know what you’re doing.

Yes or granting usage. Being an author isn’t always about forbidding, it can be about changing the work or adapting it as well.

The author can defend the work against uses that would change the meaning of the work itself (integrity).

Lastly, the author can’t deny the work is his own. And for a bunch of artist this is a bummer.

All this is more of an author’s right thing, but I think it’s slowly coming to copyright laws as well (online publication).

You need a law of some kind, that will make clear the relationship between the author and the work. A simple registry is just there to retain informations, it doesn’t make magically people care about things… Laws are better for this.

Copyright laws, specially author’s right, have one good reason to exist : it legally tied up a work with a person or an entity. This allows to create a responsibility about the work itself. For the audience, it allows the audience to held responsible the author for the content of the work. Before copyright laws a work of art was the voice of gods and such…

In some countries they don’t have copyright, but they have author’s right.

Author’s right is apply to the work and is exclusively the property of the author until the end of times (literary). This right is apply automatically on the idea of the work (it doesn’t have to be made flesh).

It’s a moral right that make the author the only one to have paternity over the work and the keeper of the work’s integrity.

It’s also a patrimonial right as the copyright (the one to make money with), which is transferred to the children at death for 70 years.

The good thing with this is : the author is 100% responsible for what becomes of the work. The author have a hudge power. And artists should be held responsible for the things done with their work. The sad thing is authors mostly still behave has if the were exploited by labels and editors. The bad thing is the patrimonial rights should expire at death not 70 years later.

As others have said libre and open source licences are a way to gain that kind of control over the work under copyright laws.