Hi, I’m lana a non-binary person cursed with being french. I like to produce garbage code, cooking and gardening. My body is holding together with tape and denial and I’m all out of tape.

  • 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 2nd, 2025

help-circle
  • In case this is in good faith :

    There is 4 lanes, you can remove one or two and set train tracks which don’t have a lot of constraints compared to cars due to train wheel being steel and having better adherence.

    People who still need car for whatever reason can use the remaining lanes and have less trafic since train are a lot more efficient than car at moving people.

    If you are woried about the swap I’m sure care exaust and tires particles which are know to damage environement a lot. Trains are electric so at least polution will be localized near power plants and thoose can be eventualy replaced by renewables.

















  • RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoJust Post@lemmy.worldLLM hallucinations
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m not arguing on religious or spiritual ground, I don’t follow any religion and I’m not into spiritual stuff.

    Reducing people to what they can produce is where my problem is. LLM are a word prediction machine by design that’s why I called them glorified autocorrect.

    I won’t waste both of our times, you have your opinion, I have mine and let’s leave it at that.



  • Search engine where already doing great at giving you answer to by description. For specialized question the wiki or documentation dedicated to your field will be much better. You have no guarantees that LLMs will not generate garbage so you have to check the source (if they exists) so just read the source it’ll waste less time and energy.

    Human are much more than 'automatic plagiarism bias machines’ … don’t dare to equate an autocorrect with life.


  • RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoJust Post@lemmy.worldLLM hallucinations
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    … You are deliberately missing the point.

    When I’m asking a question I don’t want to hear what most people think but what people that are knowledgeable about the subject of my question think and LLM will fail at that by design.

    LLMs don’t wastes a lot, they waste at a ridiculous scale. According to statista training GPT-3 is responsible for 500 tCO2 in 2024. All for what ? Having an automatic plagiarism bias machine ? And before the litany of “it’s just the training cost, after that it’s ecologically cheap” tell me how you LLM will remain relevant if it’s not constantly retrained with new data ?

    LLMs don’t bring any value, if I want information I already have search engine (even if LLMs degraded the quality of the result), if I want art I can pay someone to draw it, etc…