Even if there is, though, that would only affect you and the messages you read. If you sent it to others, they could still do what they wanted with it.

There’s no way to prevent someone from retaining data once they have it. The clients would have to voluntarily cooperate.

Fair enough

I agree and don’t use it. But that’s not an ethics question.

HA?

I pick a different one every time. Keep em guessing

Poorly phrased in the article if I understand correctly. It means it gave a correct positive diagnosis in patients who had already been diagnosed, with those percentages.

I’ve heard that from a couple of people but it’s been consistent for me. I’ll post a screenshot later. Dunno what it is but would be glad if it’s just a switch I have to flip or something.

Discord is the biggest one for me, pissed me off enough to keep me off it. If you try to do voice calls it tells you to download the app or install chrome

Kudos to you for staying engaged and responsive to feedback.

Yeah you’d think there’d be some mention of what it’s good for… seems to be a toy, reading between the lines of what the founder says

Yeah and their staff have been very dogged about promotion in language communities, including crowdsourcing the content (i.e. getting their users to produce it for free)

There was a level in Bubsy Bobcat called cheese wheels of doom… Prescient

It’s an appropriate designation in this case, and an appropriate rebuke to the law.

Whatever is touted as the primary use doesn’t matter as much as what anti-user features it enables.