PitLoversNeedMeds

Do you think management grows on trees or something?

I did think most of your little pompous group* seemed like they were sufficiently well-off to rest on your high horses and feel adequately rich to judge everyone else around you for their choices.

Either you read my original point, or you keep circling the pot and resorting to red herrings and straw-men because your fallacious ass is not rational enough to reply to the heart of the matter which I presented in my original comment.

Alright, I do seem to draw the line further than your group at the very least, but equating that with an Auschwitz example? Not cool.

So yes, I’m perfectly fine using a garbage, insane, and very probably inefficient AI in order to get a job so I can live. I’m sorry you prefer to be against it all and therefore judge anyone else not in a privileged-enough position to have a choice in the matter.

I’m sure you all have cushy jobs, that would explain a lot actually. Would be fun to do a poll on that at some point…

If you would rather stay on your pedestals and judge people because you’re above and beyond them, as you have the choice to do so, that’s your prerogative.

I give people the benefit of the doubt because I know using AI can be forced onto someone by their company if it so happens that they don’t have a choice. That’s called compassion, otherwise known as empathy. Your entire group’s reaction to my post was one of attack and derision, so I am well aware of where you all stand wrt to empathy.

I’m too stupid

We finally agree on something.

Because AI = Auschwitz, clearly an argument from a sane mind.

You’re so deep in YOUR echo chamber that you don’t see my argument for what it is lmao. I’m talking about jobs, idiot.

Keep being stubborn and facing a hiring ecological dead-zone then.

Then don’t get hired I guess? How’s your air-based diet?

I am not denying that these jobs are facing pressure now, but that’s exactly why you should conform to the demands of the job market and not be bullheaded in your denial of a tool deemed essential by so many employers to this day (even if some are finding out the hard way that it isn’t all positive).

So I stand by my point that stubborn denial of AI as a tool, and I mean a tool useful to being hired, is stupid.

The “experience” as you call it would be getting rejected by jobs that assume AI usage has become necessary.

There is no line in finding a job, it’s an existential need, you can’t live without food or water you can only buy from the money you get paid. So the “line” is moral. You’re denying job opportunities for morals 🙄…

It’s not about the idiots using them, it’s about the idiots hiring them. If you don’t conform to the job market out of sheer stubbornness you’re a fucking dumbass.

Enjoy your little echo bubble chamber, so your liwwle feewings don’t get hurt as you get left behind by people using those tools.

Not even necessarily because they’re better than you, but because management values them and people who use them, and therefore you’re choosing to leave yourself at an irrational disadvantage for no fucking reason.

You’re an idiot.

No you didn’t. You probably didn’t bother checking before running your mouth and now that you’ve been caught being an asshole you’re doing the republican trademark “can’t you take a joke?”

Another person who shows up without a source. Another day, another troll.

You’re the one tripling down at this point, when we all know your initial comment about Dalmatians (which you conveniently have not addressed, I wonder why…) had nothing to do with my comment about muzzling pitbulls.

You’re talking about Dalmatians, I’m talking about Pits, that’s whataboutism.

You may not like it. I may not care what you think.

Yes other factors behind the main point are in fact whataboutism. Thanks for confirming the inadequateness of your “point”.