

Same encryption key can create “alternative facts” - impossible to prove which conversation really happened
Can you elaborate on what this means?
Same encryption key can create “alternative facts” - impossible to prove which conversation really happened
Can you elaborate on what this means?
What you’re describing sounds pretty much exactly like how I use Proxmox at this point (everything in LXCs, most just running docker on Alpine) and I’ve been wanting to make the switch to Incus for a while. Did you migrate your LXCs over from Proxmox? I’m a little worried about how painful that process might be.
It does not mean that at all. Nothing about choosing to release a model for free or not has any bearing on whether or not the app will respect the privacy of its users.
OpenAI could feel like they’re making enough money off of their proprietary model that they don’t need to collect data (I’m not saying this is likely), while DeepSeek could have released the model for free hoping mass adoption leads to more app downloads and more data to harvest. I don’t assume either has good intentions.
You think them already invasively farming user data from tiktok somehow makes them less likely to do the same thing with another app, and not more likely?
If someone stole $1000 from you and then asked to borrow $20, would you give it to them? Surely they won’t steal that too, they already have $1000.
I have no idea what point you’re trying to make. That means they have good intentions with the data they’re collecting about the users of their mobile apps?
I run deepseek locally so obviously I appreciate that they made that decision, but let’s not pretend that something can’t be given away for free with bad intentions. People running LLMs locally are a drop in the bucket compared to people just downloading an app.
Checks out, if you’re a Gnome user you’re already used to being told how you should be doing things by them.
I agree, but they’ve also made deliberate moves to muddy the waters of open source and push the limits of what is acceptable under GPL, and I’m not going to shed any tears over their loss of potential corporate profit.
Dude you’re fighting a very uphill battle trying to make us feel bad for an IBM subsidiary.
This has no relevance to politics and I’m not attacking anything by saying forcing sign ups is a barrier to content or that you’re wrong about it having anything to do with bots, you dork.
No it isn’t, they are letting bots scrape the articles just like every other news site for that sweet, sweet SEO. Why do you think the archive.is link has the full article?
Still a wall between people clicking the link and the content.
How? The only way to prevent the site or the postal service from potentially being used for sending CSAM is indiscriminate surveillance.
Do you also think the government should be reading everyone’s mail? Should they be scanning every device capable of storing data ever shipped?
I can’t even stop windows from stealing focus on the same desktop with window rules anymore.
I just add the search to firefox and you can get the same functionality without needing to use another site to get to the one you want to search on.
I don’t think you realize that if your goal is to have a simple install method anyone can use, even redirecting the output to install.sh like in your examples is enough added complexity to make it not work in some cases. Again, those are not made for people that know bash.
If you can’t review a bash script before running it without having an unnecessarily complex one-liner provided to you to do so, then it doesn’t matter because you aren’t going to be able to adequately review a bash script anyway.
I tried fish before switching to zsh because it has much better compatibility with bash, and I think bash/zsh handles a lot of things like aliases way better. I’m also on CachyOS and the default zsh config with ohmyzsh and powerline10k it comes with is great.