- 5 Posts
- 11 Comments
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
16·20 days agoThis still doesn’t mean Google has some kind of ownership for it. Nobody stops you from forking it and taking it into a different direction.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
6·20 days agoai shit is all easy to disable
Users don’t have to disable it. Just give them a browser where they’re not enabled by default!
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
210·20 days agoGoogle tech
Chromium is open-source. It doesn’t belong to Google or anyone else.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
41·20 days agoThere aren’t better alternatives
They are literally mentioned in the article:
Those unhappy have another option: use an AI‑free Firefox fork such as LibreWolf, Waterfox, or Zen Browser.
- https://manualdousuario.net/en/mozilla-firefox-window-ai/.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
28·20 days agoYes. Chromium isn’t bad in itself though.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
131·20 days agoWhat do you mean by “we shouldn’t let perfect be the enemy of good”? Why should I use a browser which is actively anti-user when there are better alternatives out there?
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•Italic and bold markup should output italic and bold text, not emphasized and strongly emphasized textEnglish
1·1 month agobold, italics, etc. are used to indicate context
How can you guarantee they are? There are no technical restrictions or instructions on how much or where you can use emphasis and strong emphasis in your message. Until that’s not the case, “italic” and “bold” should be treated as purely presentational markup.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•Italic and bold markup should output italic and bold text, not emphasized and strongly emphasized textEnglish
1·1 month agoused for accessibility purposes Screen readers do not and should not care about presentation; abusing semantic markup to indicate through emphasis that something is italic or bold is anti-accessibility.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why does Lemmy output horribly invalid HTML?
9·2 months agoInteresting fact: Firefox (or Gecko to be accurate, because there was no single “Firefox” browser back then - there was Netscape Navigator and Mozilla Application Suite) had such rendering mode, but it was quickly abandoned.[1]
- https://hsivonen.fi/doctype/: “In the summer of 2000 before Netscape 6 was released, Gecko actually had parser modes that enforced HTML syntax rules and one of these modes was called the “Strict DTD”. These modes were incompatible with existing Web content and were abandoned.”



Your #1 mistake is assuming that users on a decentralized social media instance are a monolith.