That there is more to the context than what you see (not to mention it happened years ago with any amends that needed to be made having been made, the kind of thing pictures wouldn’t show) and that the person you initially were responding to who is trying to spread around the claims “about Triagonal” has been a part of an ongoing harassment/stalking/slandering campaign against the people they’re referring to, which is what I was alluding to.

The last two pictures portray things that took place in response to other things. The other person in the first one only got upset because she was recommending something far more NSFW and someone missed a beat when a second thing was suggested which didn’t have any inherently non-platonic-related undertones. Same with the picture after it. Everyone was throwing loose answers out there in response to a joke thread about an art phenomenon, and there was only one pairing not taken up.

The first picture’s vagueness aside, it’s amazing anyone takes someone’s word for plain grey text on a plain white backdrop that portrays something you’d expect to be impossible if the individual doing it is banned from that place for whatever reason they got banned for. It’s the equivalent of accusing someone of writing their own name on a bathroom wall when the accused person has been dead for a month. Is gullibility just the modus operandi for fediverse revolutionaries?

I can’t point out conflicts of interest?

The point being that doesn’t square well with the original verdict.

Sadly some people only care about their own perspective.

So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.

So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.

So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.

So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.

So you’re not aware then that this is someone whose descriptors match someone accused of constant returning/evading and who has been proven wrong.

Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.

Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.

Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.

Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.

Maybe it’s worth acknowledging you’re an exact copy of someone who keeps returning.

It’s about norms and vibes and nothing more. Their conclusion that you’re over 19 has about as much validity and basis as the feeling they will win the next scratch-off ticket.

It wouldn’t hurt. It’s a relative word. Some people way past their prime still could technically say they’re young or feel young.

It’s possible. You could constrict your hands somehow to find out.

I would also warn that, if you do anything in your sleep like this that is atypical of sleep, you are probably not getting a good night sleep internally.

Just a reminder that breaking the law isn’t ideal here. The laws that are there are there for a reason. My high school was full of instances where individuals who were seniors were with freshmans. And then the seniors turned 18, as time tends to do with people. They had to wait things out with some of the “pillars” (if you could call them that) of the kind of thing they were looking for. Where I live, there is no equivalent to the “Romeo and Juliet law”, the kind of law that might calibrate (perhaps overly so, or not in a good way) this kind of thing. Which some will say or point out is for the best. Whatever you do, I’d encourage you look up your laws to get an idea on this and how they map out the specifics. Can you settle for something that doesn’t clash with these? Yes? Good, settle for that. Some things can wait, my friend.

Art trades are a pastime in the art world where commissions are done with art instead of with goods/money. The art you give goes to the person you’re giving it to, and they do the same for you.

They’ve been there, tried that, and none produced the outcome OP seems like they’re thinking of.