Also not a fan to say the least.

This is a brilliant description; the feeling OP has is probably on a way more abstract level than most of the comments here are thinking of.

Most other companies can be selective in what they host / stream. YouTube will host/stream anything users upload and that’s actually quite insane. Current statistics say that YouTubers upload 30.000 hours of video… per hour.

Aside from the streaming/processing, only the disk space that would need is already frightening. Most of those videos will never be seen, and no ads will be played on them. The setup needed for this is massively more impressive to me than services like Netflix.

Do you perhaps have a source for those profit margins? I really wonder if they’re already running break even.

More like after work :)

deleted by creator

Had to look it up as well, but apparently it is how you type “hoe” in a calculator upside down…