No thanks. I choose life. Though it reminds me of this little gem
- 0 Posts
- 44 Comments
In true accordance to the post. I mistyped. I have it set as lsn.
I mistyped. I have it set as lsn.
Would “Danger” happen to be your middle name by any chance?
The most useful for me is probably
“ln = ls -n”It’s supposed to be “lsn = ls -n”.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Vintage and Retro Ads, Promos, Fliers, Etc. @sh.itjust.works•Meat, August 19463·7 days agoSince you READ the study, how do you account for waist circumference reduction on a hypercaloric ketogenic diet?
I don’t know how to account for ANYTHING, in that “study”. Since it was only done on one, singular, individual. The only thing we can learn from it. Is how this one person, personally, react to various diets while on a surplus caloric intake.
If you KNEW, it was only done on one singular individual, why the hell are you now calling it “the only serious comparison of dietary composition I’ve seen”. The fact that the only participant is a singular individual, means that it’s NOT a serious comparison. You’re contradicting yourself because you’re unable to keep up. Trying to link this and market it as something of value is incompetence at best and purposefully disingenuous at worst.
Like I already said. when studies on workout methods are performed, you will get ~1% of participants that lose muscle mass, while the remaining 99% gain muscle mass of various degrees. I sincerely hope, you can extrapolate on how useless performing a study on just a single person then is. For all you know. That person is in the 0.01 percentile of people that will react in extreme ways beyond the norm. And since you’re not testing on anyone else. You have NOTHING to compare it to.
Do you not find it inline with the carbohydrate insulin model of obesity? After all, this is exactly how Diabulimia works
I can’t find it, anything. It’s one person. Do you not understand? It doesn’t matter how “inline with XYZ model” you might think it is, or isn’t. It’s useless without a proper sample-size. Arguably useless without a control group to eliminate bias.
The study holds no merit. The methodology is extremely flawed, and you cannot use the data from this one person, to draw any conclusions on the general population.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Vintage and Retro Ads, Promos, Fliers, Etc. @sh.itjust.works•Meat, August 19463·7 days agoI actually read that study. And I seriously doubt that you did. I bet. You just glanced over the end result. Thought it aligned with your views, and called it a day.
It’s probably the most meaningless study I’ve ever seen.
You cannot draw any meaningful conclusion from it at all. Mostly, because they used, one singular. Test subject.
I’ll say that again. They used 1 person. That’s it. No control group. No ethnical diversity among test subjects. Just one guy.
Just to point out how incredibly useless that is. When they do studies on various methods of working out. They use hundreds if not thousands of people. Men and women. And in these studies. You will see, that some individuals, lose muscle mass. They do the same thing as everyone else. 99% of participants gain muscle mass of various degrees, but 1% will lose muscle mass.
Imagine if your study was done, on just that 1 person that lost muscle mass. Are you going to conclude that lifting weights will result in negative gains?
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Every support thread on Reddit is literally this nowEnglish4·10 days agoIf that’s how you feel, that’s how you feel. But I personally doubt Reddit as a company have lost out. They still have all the data. And they still have a massive user-base. I’m sure Spez is suffering real bad with his hundreds of millions…
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Every support thread on Reddit is literally this nowEnglish6·10 days agoGood for whom?
There’s been loads of times where I’ve looked everywhere for a solution, finally finding it on google page 10+ in an obscure reddit thread with like 10 votes and 4 comments where someone had found a weird, illogical solution to your exact problem, that actually worked.
It’s a shame it went to shit. The real losers are us, we lost a lot of knowledge.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Lemmy is a tech literate echo chamber1·19 days agoEh. I would wager they just don’t want to. Which is fine. But lots of people rather than saying they don’t want. Say they don’t know how. As an excuse.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Lemmy is a tech literate echo chamber91·19 days agoBecause you’re capable of following a set of instructions and when there’s something you don’t fully understand you try to look it up knowing you have the world’s combined knowledge at your fingertips.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world•2.06 meters tall volleyball player Anna Smrek (1.60m man next to her for scale)1·23 days agodeleted by creator
Oh, I missed it, sorry! I’ve never tried 04 mini myself.
AI as we know them today, will give you the most statistically probable series of data that fit the prompt.
You’re not providing any information on which AI you used so what can we say? For all we know you used a highschoolers senior project trained on failed history essays.
You report it stolen to the police. You report it stolen to your home insurance (if you have one). Then you get a new phone and move on with your life.
People talk about theft protection settings. They’re good to have. But they’re most likely not gonna get you your phone back.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Linux@programming.dev•How to minimize pain of Windows in work environment?1·6 months agoHey man, you’re the one struggling to set up printers on windows, not me.
Maybe if you were half as good as you think you are it wouldn’t be a problem.
The Control Panel still exists. You can still access all the panels you had back in win7. And you keep talking about “Powershell incantations” as if it’s magic. Maybe study up on it if you find it so difficult.
Win10 or 11 are far from perfect, but what you’re describing really isn’t that difficult to solve if you know how. You seemingly don’t. That’s a you problem.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto Linux@programming.dev•How to minimize pain of Windows in work environment?31·6 months agoYou know. I did all of those for my grandmother a few months back.
If you’re having problems with those things, that’s a you problem. Wasn’t difficult at all to set it up for her, including Uninstalling bloat.
Yes, for some I did Google a powershell solution. Literally, “how to uninstall X with powershell” and boom. Done.
I get it. It’s cool to hate on windows. I miss 7 too. But you just come across as technologically impaired.
Atomic@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why is OCR for handwritten content still that bad?83·6 months agoYou seriously need to work on your handwriting. I’m impressed OCR can make out anything at all from that.
This isn’t a OCR problem. This is a you problem. I’m human and I can only make out a few words.
Edit. Assuming it’s yours. Or is this from the scientific article? Regardless. Whoever wrote that needs to go back to third grade and redo their writing exercises.
Yes. My comment is all about letting people know that you are spreading misinformation and talk out of your ass.
It’s far better to say nothing, than to say stuff that are wrong, just for the sake of saying something.
I’m from Sweden if you need to know.
You linking a suicide script that wipes your entire drive if you make a mistake, and an old bug in steam that also wiped your drive if you made a certain mistake. Sounds like that’s in the same ballpark to me.
Question is, why would you watch it if you thought it was a waste of time? Most people would probably stop watching at that point and do something else. But hey, you do you.