The funny thing about this very dumb take, is if the people who believed it followed through, the idea would eventually die out.

And animal testing regardless of the benefit humans may receive is morally wrong.

You can say whatever you want, but just because you feel it really hard doesnt mean it will be convincing to other people.

In this particular case, I think animal testing is moral as fuck, because why in the fuck would I possibly value animal lives even close to that of a human or myself.

I mean, there are like dozens of different types of cancers, so we probably have missed some of them.

You literally didn’t tho

What grounds do they have to pull those videos?

You are aware there is no law called “If you show someone how to modify the product I sold to them (licensed to them too, as that makes no difference) I get to pull down their content” right?

You are out of your god damned mind to be logically equating modifying your OS with piracy.

This is why people who are gung ho about AI policing need to slow their role.

If they got their way, what they don’t realize is that it’s actually what the big AI companies have wanted and been begging for all along.

They want AI to stay centralized and impossible to enter as a field.

This is why they want to lose copyright battles eventually such that only they will have the funds to actually afford to make usable AI things in the future (this of course is referring to the types of AI that require training material of that variety).

What that means is there will be no competitive open source self hostable options and we’d all be stuck sharing all our information through the servers of 3 USA companies or 2 Chinese companies while paying out the ass to do so.

What we actually want is sanity, where its the end product that is evaluated against copy right.

For a company selling AI services, you could argue that this is service itself maybe, but then what of an open source model? Is it delivering a service?

I think it should be as it is. If you make something that violates copyright, then you get challenged, not your tools.

It’s so insulting they add flavour text like this as if to call you a fucking moron to your face

At the same time, easier, in that there is a lot less toxicity and bots targeting the lemmyverse

Like recently, I found a reddit thread that had a pretty obviously racist meme.

It was extremely highly upvoted, but something really felt uncanny about it, because I know racism is ramping up, but this was too blunt to feel natural to me.

Then, so many comments defending the racism were there it was odd.

That’s when I decided to look into the profiles of these comments and 9/10 of them were a year old or less, with very few comments or completely hidden profiles.

It was one of the most blatant bot/troll farm attacks I’ve ever seen and kinda shocked me.

All of there comments seemed very humanly written, but the account ages being all similar was too big a tell for me to think it was organic.

Basically, I think we’re cooked if people keep using centralized websites and or if we dont have a way to figure out what is genuine from what isn’t.

The average person goes with the flow and doesn’t think too hard about things. If through trolls or bots a country, nation state or group of billionaires can change what appears to be public opinion, we’re fucked.