Are fats part of eating real foods?
Yes. Healthy fats are a natural part of real foods such as meat, seafood, dairy, nuts, olives, and avocados. These fats support brain health, hormone function, and nutrient absorption when consumed in their natural forms.
They are really pretending meat has healthy fat, lol?
If they had simply left out that single word, their advice on fats would have been pretty good.
I don’t think the election was between trump and Trump. That would be worrisome
Even that isn’t the problem.
He was already promoting anti-vacs conspiracy theories in 2004. The tapeworm was removed in 2010. I doubt he had it for that long
The new food pyramid is just as influenced by lobbyist as the previous one. Only this time it’s the life stock industry.
Plus anti-woke MAGA wants to distance itself from vegans as much as possible.
But also, lean, fresh meat isn’t that bad. It does have a lot of protein, with really balanced amino-acids. You don’t have to carefully combine grains and legumes, in order to not miss out on essential nutrients.
Meat also has a lot of bioavailable iron and vitamin B12. Both are important and usually insufficient in a vegan diet.
If you count fish as meat, it also has bioavailable Omega-3. Especially fatty ocean-fishes like salmon. If you don’t eat fish, you either have to eat microalgae-oil or severely reduce your omega-6 consumption (no chips for you. They are fried in sunflower oil).
In contrast to fresh meat, most processed meats are really bad:
And you also shouldn’t eat a lot of fat from land animals. It has a lot of saturated fats which, you guessed it, cause cancer.
Yes, that’s quick research. Enough for a post on the internet. Far from enough for a science paper
They are missing out.
When I started reading British books in their original language, instead of the professional translations, they got about 10× funnier. And that’s despite only having B1-B2 reading comprehension. Translations can never capture all of the connotations of a word or phrase.
Your point about learning English might very well be true though. There is a high correlation amongst EU countries, between the average English level of adult citizens, and whether or not popular movies get dubbed or only get subtitles.
YouTube introduced that horrible mandatory auto-dubbing recently. At some point, that might become viable, and that will probably severely impact language acquisition.
If he only used it as a tool, I’d still say it’s his work. It should of course be included in the methodology section.
But considering he lost 2 years worth of work, just because his chats got wiped? That’s more than just a tool
Maschine Translation only really works for written text. I don’t know anyone who wanted to learn a language to read written text
If I post something in German, that’s certainly not because I want to exclude people that don’t speak German. Usually it’s just because that’s my first language. You know, the language I speak best.
At most, it’s so I can reach slightly more people in the Dach region. But that doesn’t mean they are the only ones allowed to read that.
It’s rare that there’s even an agreement on what the problem is.
I am sorry they are losing their jobs. That probably took ages to learn and it’s all that transferable.
However, translation tools are one of the better applications of LLMs. I can’t afford a translator. If I want to read an Irish website, I would be lost without translation tools. I don’t want to go back to times when they were completely unreliable
I was thinking more along the lines of copy pasting individual methods.
A different prompt might in theory do it, but I don’t trust the AI not to mess up my entire codebase just because I ask it to change a few lines
Yes. But how is that relevant?
Either the Democrats win the general election, then it’s irrelevant who the Republican candidate is, or they lose. Then the moderate Republican would be much better than the maga extremist.
I guess there could be some concerns about a moderate Republican swaying more independent voters?
They do improve the issues some, but don’t solve them fully.
They also delay your human’s internal clock, which can make it more difficult to charge them during the next cycle.
The problem for me is that humans all come with a pre-set charging start time. Charging them before that time is damn near impossible. They just won’t start charging, unless they are already dangerously drained.
But I still need my human operational at 8 am.
I’m trying to change their internal clock forward every day. They synchronize to how much light they receive.
But that’s a lot of work. And I don’t really experience CPU and RAM issues unless I try to go over that 3/1 ratio
No. To my knowledge, putting the means of production into the hands of the people was never a majority opinion. And democracy is important.
However, there are many social democratic policies that I believe have very broad support, and that still aren’t being implemented:
Then there are other policies that I think would be really good for the US, but I am not sure the support is bipartisan:
The latter category is also where I would place steps towards market socialism. For example federal laws that allow worker cooperatives (currently only some states allow them). And potentially even lowering the tax on worker co-ops compared to conventional companies.
What’s your opinion on those questions?
My yearly average is 3/1. I’m just trying not to get above that
You can easily get 3 hours for every hour of charging, even over extended periods of time. Although you might experience some issues with your CPU and RAM. And it can negatively impact the device lifespan.
Over short periods you can get away with even less charging. Although the CPU and RAM issues will get even worse.
Doesn’t the US even allow nurses to inject potent neurotoxins, as long as there is a doctor on the books that could theoretically be called?