I thought the same too, but if you take into account the whole planet, with different cultures and different climates, maybe that evens out the distribution making it uniform again? Then again, there are cultures that don’t even use the gregorian calendar so maybe that skews the distribution once again lol
Your destination: death
What makes this variant so rare?
I remember seeing this for the first time in an American movie as a kid. I was like “what in the fuck”, and I still think that to this day. It’s fucked, and the degenerate that invented it belongs to a cross.
This is so spot on lol
I mean, sure. I’m not debating whether it’s right or wrong, I’m just saying that naturally, once a minority becomes relevant, they start demanding recognition, especially if their culture differs quite a bit from the “host” country, which is not wrong in and of itself. I feel like it’s more evident when the immigrant population differs quite a bit from the host country. This is just my opinion though, based on my local and anectodal experiences, so feel free to disagree with me, I’m open to dialogue.
But I feel like I’m sidetracking from the main question here.
My sentences are weird because I’m not english.
True that, but you see the effects locally. Also, you need an arguably small portion of the population being immigrants for them to become relevant in the society, no need to replace everyone. Relevant minorities get legislation protecting them and their traditions/beliefs.
I mean, people want to keep their customs and traditions, so immigrants will bring their own customs and traditions, and if you have lots of immigrants, their customs and traditions will become the main ones in that place.
That’s PugJesus for you. Whoever they are, they know loads of cool and interesting shit, spanning history, politics, and philosophy (I think). I always engage with their posts/comments when I can because they never disappoint.
If you just think about it, it’s just people asking to be left alone and to not be hated for something that doesn’t involve anyone else. These poor fuckers.
I hate post-processing, but I think this photograph deserves to have its colors popping a bit more. It’s such a nice picture.
Thanks, I feel like this a lot. I love taking pictures with my “cheap” 50mm, and if I didn’t restrict myself to one lens only I’d bring that too because I just love it.
The 15-35 is the one tempting me the most, I’m just asking knowledgeable people if it will be enough for me with my crappy hands given the low light environment :)
Thanks a lot for the help!
I have experience with a 24mm prime and I was never truly satistied with landscape/scenery pictures because it was too narrow for them, and neither with portrait pictures because it was too wide. Of course, this is with it in my hands, there certainly are people out there who can use it better than I do.
I’m using a RF 15-30 f/4.5-6.3 when it’s bright outside and I like it a lot, I like the flexibility it gives me, that is why I’m tempted by the absolute brightness of the primes I’ve found, but also I’m tempted by the flexibility those zooms give me.
I don’t think I’ll be using an external flash because I fear my setup will become too cumbersome to carry around, and I prefer the feel I get from pictures when there is no flash involved :(
It’s going to have ambient lighting, similar to a fair, with those hanging light bulbs and illuminated stands. Hopefully I give the right idea, english is not my first language.
Another issue I have with the flash is that I don’t like its effect on the pictures, and I’ll be using it wrong because I’ve never used one so there’s also that.
Thanks a lot for the input!
Yes, I will be taking pictures of both the place and the people, especially of people being natural and not concerned about me, so I would avoid the flash for that reason too (also, the setup becomes too bulky with one).
I also enjoy very much shooting at 24mm but I’m not too comfortable with it in these situations, I’d like to be closer to the subjects but further from the scenery (if that even makes sense), but since I’m renting the lens I can go for something expensive which does both!
That 15-35 f/2.8, is it the RF one? It’s one of the lenses I’m considering. Do you have like a sample gallery I can take a look at?
Yeah, you’re right I messed up again. You use multiple, wide aperture shots to capture multiple shallow DOF pictures, and then stack the in-focus planes of each picture into one, creating a deeper DOF. Of course lol, sorry for the confusion.
Thank you for the great info! I’m learning a lot!
I really appreciate that! I’ll read those links! Just two things: you mean “narrower” aperture right? And also, this stacking is done in post production right? Because I know I have a focus stacking option in my camera but I’ve yet to use it and I was wondering if it’s for the same purpose.
So this can’t be just a wide-aperture picture because it’s a macro shot? In that case something this small would have a shallower DOF? I’m not a novice, but I’m definitely not a pro.
DISGUSTANG