I can’t wait to see the NPR article titled “Luigi Mangione was [aquitted/convicted/excuted] years ago. Why do week keep hearing his name in comment sections?”, and I’ll see this NPR article like 5-6 years from now.
Epstien died ~5 years ago, yet I still keep seeing people talking about him.
They’re gonna attempt to do so. There’s no guarantee it will work.
The whole world is in love with Luigi from what I’ve seen with my international friends.
Have you killed thousands of people through insurance denials to make a quick buck? No?
Then you’re fine.
That’s conceptually backward to how our justice system (on paper) determines guilt. It has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Luigi did it. Nobody else needs to be convicted or even accused for Luigi to be determined to be innocent.
And there are some good reasons to doubt from what we’ve seen as the public. The cops said they found his backpack in NY but then also found him with his backpack. The pictures don’t quite match. It doesn’t make sense for him to keep incriminating evidence on him in a McDonald’s. There’s a lot about it that stinks.
Dual purpose phrasing, I love it
Anything to distract from the class war.
The execs take perverse delight in the ways they rob the workers of their wealth, make them suffer, and leave them to die. They are cruel and oppressive. They aren’t simply lap dogs, and not all of then are beholden to hire ups. Many of them like Bezos and Musk are the ones in charge.
If you work at a company, did you elect the execs of that company? Do you have any way within the system of the company to hold said execs in check when they abuse their power? Did you vote for the pay scale of the company? Did you vote on benefits packages?
The answer to all these is almost certainly no. The execs are the business equivalent of dictators. They are tyrants, even if “benevolent” or controlled by a higher up tyrant.
And we see the same thing happen on a country level on the world stage. Big powers will topple or influence small countries and install a dictator that is beholden to the big power. That doesn’t make the dictator any less of a dictator just because they themselves are owned.
Execs are tyrants, and we have an amendment in mind for that.
Not necessarily disagreeing with those stipulations, because sure, there is ways around those things.
However the point is that we know the ways they track down people fairly well, so there is no value to such a trial.
🍽🍽🍽🍽🍽🍽🍽
I’m about to repartition and reinstall everything. I’m very fucking tempted to drop this dual boot nonsense now that I have a good idea of what little I’d be losing.
Don’t worry, there is still room for that.
Good. Shit like this is how you stop CEOs from getting NYCed. Though Japan still has a long way to go towards work life balance.
Great use of a fireball/meteor swarm if you have it though.
Just don’t use it by name, that is potential grounds for a mistrial.
The goal is to doubt everything the pigs say, because they’re corrupt as fuck.
Place doubt on evidence, on motivations, on testimony. Make it clear that there is insufficient evidence.
But also don’t say anything that would indicate bias against pigs, because that will absolutely get you booted during selection.
As /u/comfy said, we already know enough. We know that cops can break encryption on your phone, get everything from your social media accounts with full cooperation of the site owners, they can track your phone even if it is off, they can track your payment methods for your ebike get away vehicle to the CVS you bought your prepaid card with cash at, they can track you with the thousands of cameras they have everywhere, they can use gait identification to ID you even if you have gloves on and a mask on, they can plaster your face all over the internet, use thermal vision drones to find you in some field.
The police are militarized and have their surveillance tentacles in every crack and crevices they can. We know this already, and there is no value that such a trial would provide for that.
No, and if they do find him, the jury should vote not guilty and utilize jury nullification.
No it isn’t