It’s complicated, and maybe I wrote too soon. I admit that this exact phenomenon and its discussion are very nebulous. But I see that there is talk about the growing loneliness problem in the United States, Japan, Korea, and elsewhere. This is caused by:

1. People not wanting to raise children in today’s world. This is because of wealth inequality, which is the result of overaccumulation from the bourgeoise and weakening of the proletariat. This is explained well in Blackshirts And Reds by Michael Parenti. There is also the problem of climate change that the book also brings up, which also dissuades parents from having kids.
2. People not having enough money to raise kids. Again, this is because of the weakening of the proletariat. Rights like parental leave, like all other political rights, are not simply bestowed by some higher power, but are the result of a compromise between the owning and working class, where the owning class forfeits some of its power due to massive strikes and protests. This lack of power goes from parents to their kids. TL;DR In the United States, Korea, Japan, and elsewhere, men and women are overworked. And while a small amount of people have a massive amount of money they don’t need, the rest of the people can’t even afford to have children. This is because of the logic of Capitalism, where money is pursued instead of everything else, and everything is turned into money, which translates into power.

Boredom? I’m not bored. I’m fucking terrified of the government and the people behind it.

Capitalism makes so many things terrible that you just have to go and fight against one of them, even if it’s only one part. Of course it’s technically Capitalism that made AI so horrible, and altho ideally neural networks are a very cool technology, practically they must be fought against to the hilt.

I’m very worried about this tool and who gets to control it.

I’m worried most about the insane power it uses. Just shut down the damn data centers.

Why do you need images that are so perfect? Why can’t you just be fine with doodling?

The philosopher Diogenes was eating bread and lentils for supper. He was seen by the philosopher Aristippus, who lived comfortably by flattering the king. Said Aristippus, “If you would learn to be subservient to the king you would not have to live on lentils.” Said Diogenes, "Learn to live on lentils and you will not have to be subservient to the king.

I wish this sub didn’t allow low-effort meme posts because it’s such a brain rot circle-jerk.

There are plenty of articles that are written out that you can read. AI takes immense energy to operate, for one. It uses a lot of water. Go down and read what journalists have written, and you’ll find that there are solid points against AI development that name-calling will not do justice.

The business of a king separates him from the world…

You all need to read up on Marxism and capitalist alienation

sometimes I need to make a PowerPoint and there’s an image that I think would convey a point.

Don’t worry, we’re all here to help you out.

1. You can use GIMP to put images on top of one another.
2. You can draw stick figures and other “shorthands” for objects.
3. There’s this video here that can show you other tools for illustration rather than using AI.
4. It’s also a good idea to get into a type of drawing, where instead of detailed illustration, it deals with visualizations such as maps, graphs, and flowcharts. You might want to practice that.

Also, you might just find an image that is pre-generated by some douchebag and ends up in your search results. The main thing you don’t want to do is generate any new material.

Suburban households and their culture have been a disaster for the human race.

Look, if you’re not an artist, instead of looking to a machine, cooperate with someone else. AI image generation is not worth your time. Ask yourself this: What is the point of art? What reason do we have to make pictures at all?

This is not to be smug or to “pwn” you. Legitimately think about this; I’d recommend twenty seconds.

See if any of the reasons given apply to AI art. To me, they don’t. Art itself is opposed to Taylorism, so applying Taylorist principles to art doesn’t work.

Doodle on the back of a receipt. Just do it.

You can search the articles. Find an illustration that encapsulates things. If you’re using a PC, you can use GIMP to put text on an image. I think that, concerning such a mathematical type of technology, you’ll probably have to explain things in text, and get people on board with using text instead of images. A good start would be to talk about the energy problems, but you’ll find tons of news articles explaining why it’s bad.

then lobby your government

First of all, only 5% of people live in the United States. Saying “your government” as if it’s the only one is bad practice. There are countless other governments out there. Secondly, I don’t know if the U.S. Gov’t can easily be lobbied by grassroots movements as opposed to local bundle-state governments. An example is Oregon, which is a very left-leaning state that has provided welfare to its citizens, even if the federal government can’t.

microsoft is a corp, they’re only beholden to profit. even if they could give a shit about the poors they wouldn’t unless it could make pretty lines go up.

This is why you should find ways to oppose this:

1. Vote and campaign in your bundle-state. Getting the entire federal government to do something is hard, but getting Pennsylvania, the holder of Three-Mile Island, to intervene and declare it illegal to build nuclear power plants there is easier, not just because you need less votes, but because most people who live in PA probably remember what happened there.
2. Do sabotage. This will not just be the government going against Microsoft, but the people as well. You can block trucks from coming in, you can vandalize the property, break stuff, and steal things. People of all political positions have done this successfully.
3. Boycott Microsoft, or do economic action against them. You know about something Microsoft doesn’t like? Make it bigger. Get people on a Linux distro. Have people keep the computers they bought, and buy used computers so you don’t give money to Microsoft. In xUbuntu there is a host of applications that effectively replace the Microsoft Office Suite, if you ever needed that.

i don’t mean to be a dick but this is poor rhetoric. “their nuclear power plant is selfish and bad bc i said so >:(“ really only serves to give libs canon fodder for the “personal responsibility^tm” gun.

All you need to do is show them how bad AI is and they’ll understand why its a bad thing, and then show them the solutions. The rhetoric isn’t just “they’re hogging our energy”, it’s “AI is a really bad thing that clogs up the internet, and it could be used to fake evidence and make CSM, and the resources for its operation could be used for better ends.” A big problem is that people think AI is unstoppable. It has nothing to do with the rhetoric of personal responsibility, and everything with AI looking like an unyielding miracle weapon. Showing how much AI takes to run strips it of its terror, and emboldens people to take action against it, since they know the devil is not as terrible as he is painted.

ik it seems like pedantry but this is a serious issue with leftist messaging in the modern world.

The real issue is that Leftists need to become more populist and aligned with the blue-collar working class of miners, farmers, and factory workers rather than the white-collar working class of filmmakers, game designers, and programmers. Many people assumed that blue-collar work would become obsolete, and I guess that due to the internet, more leftist ideas spread there than in the real world. The academization of Leftism is long and complicated, and has a lot to do with the growth of communication technology and the fall of the Berlin Wall, but I’d still argue that such academization is what made Leftism as impotent as it is. What needs to be done for Leftism is a “touching grass” of sorts, and a focus away from schools and universities and towards fields and factories. Leftism post-Biden should be modeled after the successes of Vladimir Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, and Mao Zedong, rather than the failures of Ralph Nader, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama.

I think it’s fine to bitch about technology.

AI is not a development in technology. It’s like Flexplay, asbestos filters for cigarettes, and leaded gasoline.

• Clip art from the 90’s was made with passion
• It didn’t threaten the environment as much
• There wasn’t any attempt to outdo real artists
• You don’t have it as a business model
• There isn’t an uproar about it
• Nothing was stolen to make the clip art

This is very confusing. AI also isn’t technological progress, just like how leaded gasoline and Flexplay wasn’t technological progress.

This “art” costs far more environmentally than any other. It uses mass amounts of electricity and water. It’s nothing like, say, eating steak instead of salad, or driving a pickup truck to work. The “miracle” of AI has to come from somewhere, after all.

Disabled people can make great art. They can also hire someone else to help them; people who work succeed more together than apart.

I also think that having someone make a nice image is not worth the sheer amount of electrical energy and water cooling needed to power the datacenters.