Nah, there’s a difference between chatbot and not knowing a language.

They’re predictive text, so grammar is actually one of it’s strong suits. The problem is the words don’t actually mean anything.

Someone online would likely spend a little time trying to understand it, run thru a translator, realized it was slop, and move on relatively quickly.

That’s something trump and his people have never understood.

They expect 100% loyalty, but treat the troops like actual shit. And this isn’t gonna be a temporary thing, he’s pulling NG from the reddest states because he expects them to be most likely to obey, but it’s just pissing them off.

He should have spent the next two years spoiling the shit out them. Bonuses out the ass, lots of long paid optional training so they can bank money. Give them all the newest toys and gear.

Build up that loyalty and then bring them in next 1/6 when you’re going to pull some shit.

It’s really not that hard to figure this stuff out, the only saving grace is they’re comically inept

It’s kind of a shitty job, so lots of people sign up, do it a very short time, and quit

Sometimes they sell the account, sometimes it gets hacked.

But it’s a way for people who shouldn’t be able to deliver for whatever reason, are able to deliver.

If you were nicer, people would stick around longer and try to help you underthings…

You get that?

An Ontario film distributor has alleged that the shootings are linked to an intimidation campaign by other film distributors to prevent popular South Indian movies from appearing in large chains.

Guy who distributes Indian movies claims attacks on random movie theaters are to prevent his movies from being watched…

I didn’t search very hard, but I can’t find a single other source for that being a thing.

Even if it was, that’s basically the opposite of a protection racket. You get that right?

Yeah.

If you pay protection, it’s because the payment is less than random thefts would be.

The gang you pay, is supposed to be scary enough that random crime doesn’t happen in “their” areas.

So you getting robbed, is an insult to their reputation. And to regain that rep, they find the idiots who robbed a store under their protection.

Now, whether or not you see any of that money back isn’t really for sure. Because what matter is the reputation among the criminal underground.

But the whole process is outdated, I’d be surprised if it’s still happening large scale. Most likely only for businesses who are already breaking the law, they couldn’t contact cops anyways.

Like a methlab.

You can’t call the cops even if you know who robbed the methlab. So if you don’t have muscle. You pay for protection

I often quote foreign legislation when showering too…

It’s not like they backed factions based on ideology…

In virtually everyone of those proxy governments it was a dictator who agreed to back one side or the other

Weird…

I thought it was clear the issue was how they asked, but apparently not.

Did you really expect to get an answer after asking like that?

Like, you realize you’re asking for someone’s time and effort…

Right?

No.

Because they already don’t need a CEO to operate…

The entire point of a C- suite is to have a room full of fall guys for the board.

That’s it.

It does…

What you’re thinking of is “contiguous”.

Continental: everything but Hawaii, 49/50

Contiguous: everything except Hawaii and Alaska, 48/50

So…

I think what you’re trying to show is what names skew the most to red/blue?

But that’s not what the title says or the chart is labeled as…

Adams is dumb enough to do it too, even though that’s just going to make more people switch to Mamdani

Holy shit …

You think a small amount of the wealthiest people control everything because they’re greedy and want more wealth!!!

How oh how did you ever manage to discover that in your “charting”?

You must share your knowledge with the world, no one else has ever had such a unique and insightful thought as:

The rich run shit, and they’re criminal assholes

1972:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Chisholm

But to be honest I only knew that because of RA the Rugged man:

Reagan was the Pres’, but I voted for Shirley Chisholm

Did you understand that lyric? You’re too young, of course you didn’t, c’mon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnBSmjDEVVQ

That’s more coicindence than causation tho…

Like, what’s more important than that is they were both:

1. Historically unpopular within their own party

2. Backing policy significantly to the right of the Dem voting base.

3. So little charisma it was basically a negative

4. Bought and paid for by the wealthy

5. Openly antagonistic to anyone who didn’t only say positive things

6. Refused to even open a dialog with the left, and a willingness to pre-emptively acquiesce to demands from the right.

Bonus:

Bill and Hillary ran as a “two for one” so she was seen as a continuation of Bill. And Kamala couldn’t stop saying she’d do everything the same way as Biden. They made themselves “establishment candidates” when the only party that’s every worked for was Republicans. To make matters worse, trump was still running as anti-establishment and people were falling for it.

The only good time to be an “establishment candidate” is when the average American already has a good life…

That hasnt been true in a while, the majority of voters these days weren’t an adult the last time shit was ok. It’ll take a generation before the next “establishment candidate” has a shot, because it’ll take that long for people to trust the establishment again, even if we hit the ground running in 2028 and start fixing shit day 1.

hat her broker, Peter Bacanovic, tipped her off that ImClone was about to drop

It’s not one or the other.

If her broker said:

You need to sell

Then she wouldn’t have broken any laws.

But he said he had insider knowledge that it would drop. And he really did have insider knowledge and it did…

Like, you realize she has literally the best lawyers can buy, is a rich and connected white person…

And she still went to jail. Why are you just insisting she’s not guilty?

Yes. Somalia has 1,900 miles of coastline, a government that knows its place, and all the guns and wives you can afford to buy. Why have I never heard of this paradise before?

-Pierce Hawthorne