In my entire life (and as context my earliest experiences with a PC predate the first consumer-available apple computer) there has not been a single time where I have felt the phrase “only Apple can achieve” to be worthy of anything other than a snort.
Apple’s unshakable confidence that everything they do is earth shattering is overlapping heavily with that mediocre white man saying these days.
“Convenience” is what is gonna destroy the whole world.
This very thought ran through my head not 48 hours ago. I’m a little creeped out. 😬
But that’s the one thing that it’s designed to do.
And poorly, and unethically, at that.
I think there are multiple levels on which to be annoyed by this article. 😬
Fuck Spez!
It does not seem like the most likely of possibilities at the moment though, I must admit.
thank God I am not American
And by the way, the French are the ones who know how to get shit done. We’ve probably started too late to stop the slide before it gets really bad over here.
Let me try one more time.
Do you think Angela Davis dodges this question, or do you feel she thoroughly, satisfyingly, answers it? It’s not a long clip.
Because as best as I can tell, you will again decide that you decide how those being actively harmed should respond and what is an acceptable response from those people, and again characterize her response as advocating violence, rather than recognize how such a viewpoint does nothing but empower those who seek to oppress.
Every word she speaks is in support of her summation at the end.
You did an awful lot of arguing to demonstrate that you still didn’t really read it, and by read I mean digest it, nor fathom why I suggested you start there.
Because you are defensively pearl clutching about entirely different things than the most relevant bit to your arguments here, which is how ridiculous and harmful it is for those in a position of privilege to clutch their pearls about whether the protest actions of those being actively harmed and killed might not be convenient in their timing or execution.
And when you reach the point of recognizing why such pearl clutching is actively harmful to others, instead of reflexively insisting it’s not what you are doing, or insisting that it isn’t harmful, quite a lot of other things will fall in place.
Good day.
You can pretend NYT has no influence on popular opinion and therefore politics, and ignore their misrepresentation of the genocide if you wish, but that doesn’t cause your argument to magically become valid.
You should do some reading. Start here.
I’d hope current events would be the counter argument. Take your pick regarding country/continent and event. I’m being intentionally vague to ensure I don’t run afoul of the rules of the sidebar, but there are legitimately many examples currently, some mentioned by others in this discussion.
I should add that events such as “You’ve been doing X which has always been legal for your entire life, but now worldchangingevent or policychange has happened and it’s no longer legal, and they are persecuting people for it” have always been pretty plausible hypotheticals. We just have modern, current examples of how wrong that can go now.
Deepseek is from China, and rumored to be controlled by their government. So I wanted to see if it could say that very controversial phrase from a few years ago. It could not. Data point achieved, no further editorializing (nor queries regarding Chairman Xi or other far away politicians) required.
Thank you! I do, and I will do!
I’ve got fairly low end hardware, this was just easily installable via gpt4all so I gave it a shot. :)
I will play with some others…
Thanks!
His last words were:
You mother fuckers!
Unless we win the lottery or my long lost cousin from somewhereelseistan calls to let me know they’ve got a spot for us, we’re sheltering in place unfortunately.
You know I’ve had this feeling for a long time. But I really have it now.
Look at everything going on, everything he’s doing. If AOC (arbitrary example, but he’ll call any Democrat a “radical marxist” through the entire campaign no matter who it is) is elected in 2028, will he and his handlers go “well, at least it will take them a long time to unfuck things?” No, there’s no way that happens.
Maybe we’ll get an honest election and maybe we’ll learn the results of it. I don’t think he leaves in Jan 2029 without a fight no matter who wins, unless it’s Vance, and maybe not even then.
And to be clear, there’s no way the Dems will run AOC or anyone like her. We’ll probably get someone even further right than Kamala or Biden since it seems to be Republican votes they actually want now.
I only have hope for 2028 actually resulting in Trump no longer being president if the cheeseburgers take him before then, or the 2026 midterms are not only a blue wave, but also entirely above board and free of shenanigans.
You aren’t taking anything from anyone. It’s just an algorithmically generated activation.
This is so easy it’s kinda nuts, and there are multiple methods to activate. All you should need for Windows these days.
https://massgrave.dev/